This story is from February 17, 2023

Use of derogatory words repeatedly by wife cruelty: Delhi HC

Delhi High Court has observed that repeated use of derogatory and humiliating words by a woman against her husband and his family amounts to cruelty.
Use of derogatory words repeatedly by wife cruelty: Delhi HC
Image used for representational purpose only
NEW DELHI: Delhi High Court has observed that repeated use of derogatory and humiliating words by a woman against her husband and his family amounts to cruelty.
The division bench of Justices Sanjeev Sachdeva and Vikas Mahajan said every person is entitled to live with dignity and honour and no one can be expected to live with constant abuse being hurled at him.
1x1 polls
"In the present case, the conduct of the appellant-wife, which has been proved on record, is of such quality, magnitude and impact as would have caused mental agony, pain, anger and suffering to the respondent-husband on a regular and continuous basis and, thus, clearly amounting to cruelty," said the bench.
The high court dismissed the wife's appeal challenging the divorce order passed by the family court, which allowed the husband's petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty.
Referrring to the comments attributed to the wife, the high court said "repeated use of the words of the nature as extracted herein are clearly humiliating and would certainly amount to cruelty". The bench upheld the findings of the family court, which had observed that the husband was treated with cruelty by the wife and that she used to abuse him and his parents in filthy language.
The high court was satisfied that cruelty, which was proved on record, was sufficient and constituted cruelty as required under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act. "Consequently, we find no infirmity in the judgment allowing the petition and granting divorce on the ground of cruelty. We, accordingly, find no merit in the appeal. The appeal is consequently dismissed," the bench noted.
End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA