'Extraordinarily anti-American decision': Donald Trump unleashes fury at US Supreme Court after hiking global tariffs from 10% to 15%
In a post on Truth Social, the MAGA supremo blasted the Supreme Court’s ruling as “ridiculous and poorly written” and declared it “extraordinarily anti-American.” A furious Trump wrote, “Based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on tariffs issued yesterday, after MANY months of contemplation, by the United States Supreme Court, please let this statement serve to represent that I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been ‘ripping’ the US off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level.”
“During the next short number of months, the Trump Administration will determine and issue the new and legally permissible tariffs, which will continue our extraordinarily successful process of Making America Great Again — GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE!!!,” he added further.
The move came after the US Supreme Court declared Trump’s tariff actions illegal and questioned his authority to impose sweeping import duties without congressional approval.
Immediately after the ruling, Trump expressed his “deep disappointment” in an agitated tone and said he was “ashamed” of the Supreme Court. He alleged that the judgment had been influenced by “foreign interests.”
The enraged US president also declared, “I can do anything I want.” Moving ahead using tariff as weapon, Trump invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a fresh 10 per cent global tariff on imports, which he revised on Saturday to 15 per cent.
Supreme Court's ruling on Trump tariffs
In a strong rebuttal to Trump, chief justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said the President does not have the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 to impose tariffs. The court stated that “had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs, it would have done so expressly.”
The ruling supports earlier decisions by the US Court of International Trade and a federal appeals court. Both courts had found that IEEPA, a law usually used to freeze assets or block financial transactions during national emergencies, does not automatically give the President the power to impose tariffs.
Three conservative justices, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh, disagreed with the majority opinion. In their dissent, they argued that the law’s broad language allowing the President to “regulate” economic transactions during a declared emergency should be understood to include the power to impose tariffs.
Top Comment
A
Abhijeet
28 minutes ago
His pymp is disfuntional.Read allPost comment
Popular from Business
- The $170Bn question: US SC junks Trump tariffs, but who will get the refunds?
- Nothing changes for India: Donald Trump's big statement on trade deal after US Supreme Court strikes down tariffs
- 'I've best legal team': Indian-American lawyer Neal Katyal who argued against Trump tariffs
- 'Why did we compromise our ... ': Congress raises 7 questions after US court strikes down Trump tariffs
- Trump accuses SCOTUS of being swayed by foreign interests after legal setback; attacks US companies and attorneys with India ties
end of article
Trending Stories
- NZ vs PAK, T20 World Cup: PAK vs NZ Super 8 match abandoned due to rain
- PAK vs NZ Super 8s weather forecast: What happens if rain washes out Colombo clash?
- Colombo rain: What is the cut-off time for PAK vs NZ T20 World Cup Super 8 match?
16:16 Trump accuses SCOTUS of being swayed by foreign interests after legal setback; attacks US companies and attorneys with India ties09:18 ‘Reflection of trust’: PM Modi, Brazil President Lula sign rare earths deal; aim for trade beyond $20 billion- Never got H-1B, couldn't visit home in 8 years: 30-year-old Indian man dies in US, fundraiser says he was under a lot of stress
- 'Why Dallas looks like New Delhi': Texas senator John Cornyn slammed for now-deleted 'Welcome to Indian century' post
Featured in Business
03:47 US Supreme Court tariff ruling adds uncertainty to global trade outlook, offers limited relief: Analysts03:58 India, Brazil discuss US Supreme Court striking down reciprocal tariffs, set $30 billion trade goal- 'Countries ripping the US off': Trump hikes worldwide tariff to 15% after Supreme Court setback
04:16 India eyes expansion of Mercosur trade pact to boost market access, investments: Piyush Goyal05:19 US tariff cut to 10% boosts outlook for India’s labour-intensive exports; pharma, textiles among key gainers- Pharma exports grow 9.4% to $30.47 billion in FY25; industry eyes double-digit expansion by 2026-27
Photostories
- From recalling their dating days to Gautami’s divorce phase and Ram calling himself an absent father; Ram Kapoor and Gautami Kapoor get candid about marriage and kids
- Sunday binge watch: These Hulu dramas are a must try
- From 'Emily in Paris' to 'Made in Heaven': 5 times OTT dramas redefined fashion
- Zodiac signs that may face relationship challenges in 2026
- 8 Indian tea-time snacks you can air fryer instead of deep fry
- 6 tandoori-style dishes made easily in an air fryer
- 7 iconic paneer starters for guests and instant cravings
- From decorating the house to preparing Iftaar: Dipika Kakar and Shoaib Ibrahim share their Ramadan preparations
- Bengaluru to Goa by Vande Bharat in just over 12 hours? What we know
- 'e200x': Chennai startup to develop first electric air taxi
Up Next