Why did the pilots attempt a second landing at Baramati airfield?
They couldn’t visually acquire Runway 11 on the first approach, so they executed a go-around and repositioned for a second landing attempt.
Did the flight crew issue a Mayday or distress call before the crash?
No distress call was made, suggesting the pilots may not have perceived an immediate emergency or lacked time to declare one.
What type of airfield is Baramati, and why is it significant?
Baramati is an uncontrolled airfield without ATC services, putting full responsibility for navigation and landing on the pilots.
What were the weather and visibility conditions at the time of landing?
Visibility was around 3,000 metres with calm winds; pilots were advised to land under visual conditions at their discretion.
What inconsistency did the crew report during the second approach?
Initially, the runway was not visible; later it was reportedly in sight, raising questions about situational awareness during final approach.
What communication lapse occurred just before the crash?
The crew did not provide a readback after receiving clearance to land, and flames were observed near the runway shortly after, indicating possible miscommunication.
Did DGCA audits raise any safety red flags about the operator before the crash?
No. The latest audit in February 2025 found the operator compliant, with no Level-I safety deficiencies.
What does the DGCA timeline reveal about the aircraft’s final minutes?
The aircraft attempted two approaches, remained in communication with ground services, and was cleared to land minutes before flames were spotted.
Where exactly was the wreckage found in relation to the runway?
The aircraft came down just short of Runway 11, on the left side near the threshold, showing misalignment during landing.
Who is responsible for investigating the crash, and why?
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is probing the crash as per aviation safety regulations for fatal accidents.
Start a Conversation
Post comment