Nicola Peltz quietly bashes the trolls under the controversial post; netizens accuse her of 'controlling her husband' - Deets Inside

Nicola Peltz, the ‘Lola’ actress, faces backlash after she shares pictures celebrating her billionaire father’s birthday, featuring her husband, Brooklyn Beckham. The post comes weeks after a public conflict occurred, where the couple did not attend Davis Beckham’s 50th birthday party.

Nicola Peltz's post...turned controversial

Sparking the Beckham family feud yet again, Nicola shared a series of the birthday bash, where the family joined to celebrate the 83rd birthday of Nelson Peltz. “happy birthday dad! i am so lucky to be your daughter, you’re the most loving and supportive father i could ever dream of. i love you more than i could ever begin to express - you’re the wind beneath my wings. i loved celebrating you yesterday! thank you for always being there for us - our constant love and support,” she captioned the post.

The comments under the post...

However, the netizens were quick to call her out, stating that she doesn’t allow him to celebrate his father’s birthday. The backlash grew with lightning speed, and called her selfish because she encourages him to be close with her family, but not the other way around. Many people requested that Brooklyn look after his father, citing that in-laws could turn their backs at any moment, but the family would not. Others added that for someone who values her family, Peltz should know better.

As a striking response to the situation, Nicola liked a comment that shared her sentiments and voiced her opinions. “The fact people are in this comment section talking bs about someone controlling a GROWN man is absurd. The guy is an adult and can make his own decisions, leave them be and stop blaming women for everything.” The actress sent a silent but clear message to her trolls.

Another user defended the couple by stating, “The bulling of Brooklyn and Nicola, when absolutely no one but them knows what goes on behind the closed doors, just smacks of pure ignorance.”