Brisk walking vs jogging: Which is better to lose 3 kgs in 1 month
Losing 3 kilos in a month might sound like a big ask, but for many, it's a goal worth chasing. The usual advice that we get is to get moving, either by brisk walking or jogging. While both these forms of cardio are mostly recommended for weight loss, the real question is: which one works better when the goal is specific, like shedding 3 kilos in just 30 days? Here’s what we need to know about which one is better for brisk walking and jogging.
Brisk walking is often promoted as a gentle and also effective form of exercise, especially for beginners or those with joint concerns. It’s said to burn calories steadily without exhausting the body.
Brisk walking does help in burning calories, especially when done consistently for 45 minutes to an hour daily. On average, it can burn around 250–300 calories per hour, depending on body weight and pace. But here’s the catch: it demands more time and discipline. To lose 3 kilos (around 23,000 calories) in a month, walking alone might fall short unless it’s backed by a calorie-controlled diet. For those with a slower metabolism, even an hour of brisk walking daily might just maintain the current weight, not reduce it.
Jogging is often seen as the go-to for serious weight loss. Many believe it burns double the calories of walking and accelerates fat loss.
Jogging indeed burns more, almost 500–600 calories per hour. That makes it more efficient for losing weight in a shorter time frame. However, it comes with its own drawbacks. For someone not used to intense movement, jogging can cause muscle fatigue, joint strain, and even burnout after a week. And let’s not forget, the more intense the exercise, the higher the risk of giving up halfway through the month.
So while jogging may look like the shortcut, it's not sustainable for everyone, and that matters more than it seems.
This is where things get real. Studies show that consistent calorie burn, even if it’s moderate, wins over inconsistent high-intensity sessions. So, if a person can brisk walk every single day, clocking 10,000 to 12,000 steps, the long-term result might be better than jogging thrice a week followed by days of muscle pain.
Consistency also builds routine, which triggers better hormone regulation, especially the ones that control appetite, metabolism, and fat storage.
Brisk walking keeps the heart rate at about 50–60% of the maximum, while jogging pushes it to 70–85%. The body burns a higher percentage of fat at moderate intensity; this is called the “fat-burning zone.” That means brisk walking, when done long enough, actually utilises more fat for energy than jogging, which relies more on carbohydrates.
Recent findings suggest that moderate-intensity cardio (like walking fast) maintains fat metabolism better over time than high-intensity sessions that drain glycogen stores and leave the body craving food. So the after-burn might not be as helpful if the appetite spikes afterwards.
Intense cardio, especially jogging without strength training, can cause muscle loss. And muscle burns more calories at rest. Losing muscle mass while trying to lose fat might backfire, slowing down the metabolism in the long run.
Brisk walking, being gentler, preserves muscle mass better, especially when combined with light bodyweight exercises. That means more fat is lost without losing strength.
Here’s what’s often ignored: psychological fatigue. Jogging, while effective, can be mentally exhausting, especially for someone not used to pushing the limits. Brisk walking, on the other hand, feels more natural. It can be meditative, social, and even enjoyable. That enjoyment can make or break the 1-month commitment.
One behavioural study from Stanford University found that people stuck longer to walking-based routines than jogging-based ones. That means better chances of actually reaching that 3 kg goal, and staying there.
Brisk walking feels easier: But is it enough?
Brisk walking is often promoted as a gentle and also effective form of exercise, especially for beginners or those with joint concerns. It’s said to burn calories steadily without exhausting the body.
Brisk walking does help in burning calories, especially when done consistently for 45 minutes to an hour daily. On average, it can burn around 250–300 calories per hour, depending on body weight and pace. But here’s the catch: it demands more time and discipline. To lose 3 kilos (around 23,000 calories) in a month, walking alone might fall short unless it’s backed by a calorie-controlled diet. For those with a slower metabolism, even an hour of brisk walking daily might just maintain the current weight, not reduce it.
Jogging burns more; but it’s not for everyone
Jogging is often seen as the go-to for serious weight loss. Many believe it burns double the calories of walking and accelerates fat loss.
This apart, exercise too can help with your weight loss goals
So while jogging may look like the shortcut, it's not sustainable for everyone, and that matters more than it seems.
What really matters?
This is where things get real. Studies show that consistent calorie burn, even if it’s moderate, wins over inconsistent high-intensity sessions. So, if a person can brisk walk every single day, clocking 10,000 to 12,000 steps, the long-term result might be better than jogging thrice a week followed by days of muscle pain.
Consistency also builds routine, which triggers better hormone regulation, especially the ones that control appetite, metabolism, and fat storage.
Role of heart rate
Brisk walking keeps the heart rate at about 50–60% of the maximum, while jogging pushes it to 70–85%. The body burns a higher percentage of fat at moderate intensity; this is called the “fat-burning zone.” That means brisk walking, when done long enough, actually utilises more fat for energy than jogging, which relies more on carbohydrates.
Recent findings suggest that moderate-intensity cardio (like walking fast) maintains fat metabolism better over time than high-intensity sessions that drain glycogen stores and leave the body craving food. So the after-burn might not be as helpful if the appetite spikes afterwards.
Weight loss also depends on muscle preservation
Intense cardio, especially jogging without strength training, can cause muscle loss. And muscle burns more calories at rest. Losing muscle mass while trying to lose fat might backfire, slowing down the metabolism in the long run.
Brisk walking, being gentler, preserves muscle mass better, especially when combined with light bodyweight exercises. That means more fat is lost without losing strength.
Here’s what’s often ignored: psychological fatigue. Jogging, while effective, can be mentally exhausting, especially for someone not used to pushing the limits. Brisk walking, on the other hand, feels more natural. It can be meditative, social, and even enjoyable. That enjoyment can make or break the 1-month commitment.
One behavioural study from Stanford University found that people stuck longer to walking-based routines than jogging-based ones. That means better chances of actually reaching that 3 kg goal, and staying there.
end of article
Health +
- A game-changer in cancer research? South Korean scientists reprogram tumour cells without chemotherapy or radiation
- Diet for a long life: Planetary health diet which can support longevity beyond 100
- Optical Illusion: Can you spot the odd number in this picture?
- Want to get fit, and strengthen your lower back? Do this simple exercise!
- Woman paralysed after weight loss surgery: Here's what happened
- Fitness coach reveals 3 genius hacks to enjoy junk food without harming health
Trending Stories
- Saina Nehwal pens heartfelt note confirming the end of her marriage with Parupalli Kashyap
- Popularly prescribed pain drug can increase the risk of dementia by up to 40%, reveals study
- Colon cancer rising among youngsters: Top US doc alerts about 5 warning signs
- R Madhavan addresses ongoing Hindi-Marathi language row: 'I speak Tamil, I've never experienced it'
- Lokesh Kanagaraj reacts to Sanjay Dutt’s ‘he wasted me in Thalapathy Vijay’s Leo' remark: ‘I’m not a genius or a great filmmaker…’
- Airport alert: These everyday snacks are banned from carry-on bags on flights by TSA
- When John Abraham spoke about not having children; the actor has been married to Priya Runchal since 2014
- Magnesium vs Melatonin: Which supplement is better for nerves, sleep, and overall health, and why
- Kabir Bedi recalls last meeting with Parveen Babi a year before her death: ‘She said, people think I’m mad... you too’
- Dilip Kumar once spoke about not having child with wife Saira Banu to carry his legacy forward: 'We feel we are lucky to be there for...'
Visual Stories
- 10 foods that help relieve constipation naturally
- 10 things to know before getting Lovebirds as pets
- 9 quotes that feel like poetry for the soul
- 10 baby girl names that mean sparkle
- 8 health benefits of drinking honey and cinnamon water regularly
- 10 things to know before getting a Persian cat
- 10 most colourful and beautiful birds to have as pets
- 8 Indian breakfasts from 8 different states to try this month
- Baby names that are making a comeback in 2025
Photostories
- From Mohanlal's self-troll to strong warning for cliche gamers: 7 details of Bigg Boss Malayalam 7 promo
- Why don't we cut nails after sunset - Here's what tradition says
- Move over Himalayas: 10 South Indian hill stations that steal the show
- Amitabh Bachchan and Jaya Bachchan’s Net Worth: Inside their Rs 1,578 crore empire of love and luxury
- Eating these foods for breakfast can help in better weight loss
- Are peaches the next superfruit? 10 surprising reasons you probably didn’t know
- Zeenat Aman’s real story: Secret wedding, broken marriage, and surprising life facts
- Numerology Predictions Today, July 15, 2025: Read your personalized forecast for numbers 1 to 9
- 10 Countries besides India that experience the monsoon season
- 5 real-life animals that depend on blood diet
Top Trends
Up Next
Start a Conversation
Post comment