This story is from October 06, 2020
Covid-19 intubation may be less risky than feared: Study
PARIS: Procedures like inserting or removing
A particular concern for doctors and nurses during the
This has caused health authorities in Britain to classify them as '
But a new study published in Anaesthesia, the journal of the Association of Anaesthetists, found that both intubation and the removal of the breathing tube after surgery produce much less aerosol than had previously been assumed.
While the research was not performed on patients with Covid-19 for safety reasons, the authors from
"The results suggest that during anaesthesia tube insertion should not be considered a high-risk procedure," the authors said.
"We detected no increases in aerosolised particles during face-mask ventilation, airway suction or repeated attempts at intubation," they wrote.
"This reflects typical clinical practice by anaesthetists with a range of experience, providing further reassurance regarding the low level of aerosol generation."
The researchers worked to quantify the aerosols generated during various anaesthesia procedures for insertion and removal of tubes from patients' airways, as well as other breathing assistance, in real clinical settings.
They looked at 19 tube insertions and 14 tube removals and found -- against expectations -- that tube insertion generated approximately one thousandth of the aerosol generated by a single cough.
Tube removal produced more aerosol, especially when accompanied by a weak cough, which sometimes occurs when patients resume breathing on their own.
But researchers said this was still less than 25 per cent of that produced by a voluntary cough.
The authors note that their study was limited because they were unable to directly study the risk of transmission of the new coronavirus, adding their "interpretation rests on the widely accepted link between aerosol generation and infection risk".
They said the research could have implications for the distribution of protective equipment in hospitals, which is allocated on the basis of how risky a given situation is considered.
breathing tubes
, which were thought to pose a serious danger ofCovid-19 transmission
to health workers, produce less aerosols than anormal cough
, according to new research published on Tuesday.A particular concern for doctors and nurses during the
pandemic
has been that intubation -- when a tube is placed in the patient's airway to help them breathe -- could create a fine mist of viral particles and create an infection danger for hospital staff.aerosol
generating procedures', meaning health workers need respirators and high levelpersonal protective equipment
and the operating rooms are cleaned using a special technique to remove aerosols. Researchers say using this technique has "dramatically" slowed surgery and contributed to long hospital waiting lists.But a new study published in Anaesthesia, the journal of the Association of Anaesthetists, found that both intubation and the removal of the breathing tube after surgery produce much less aerosol than had previously been assumed.
While the research was not performed on patients with Covid-19 for safety reasons, the authors from
the University of Bristol
and hospitals in Bristol and Bath called for the risk levels of the procedures to be reassessed."We detected no increases in aerosolised particles during face-mask ventilation, airway suction or repeated attempts at intubation," they wrote.
"This reflects typical clinical practice by anaesthetists with a range of experience, providing further reassurance regarding the low level of aerosol generation."
They looked at 19 tube insertions and 14 tube removals and found -- against expectations -- that tube insertion generated approximately one thousandth of the aerosol generated by a single cough.
Tube removal produced more aerosol, especially when accompanied by a weak cough, which sometimes occurs when patients resume breathing on their own.
The authors note that their study was limited because they were unable to directly study the risk of transmission of the new coronavirus, adding their "interpretation rests on the widely accepted link between aerosol generation and infection risk".
They said the research could have implications for the distribution of protective equipment in hospitals, which is allocated on the basis of how risky a given situation is considered.
Popular from Business
- 'Every attack makes us stronger': Gautam Adani on US allegations
- Bank Holidays December 2024: On what days will banks be closed in December? Check state-wise holiday list
- India's GDP growth slows to 2-year low of 5.4% in Q2, adding pressure on RBI to cut rates
- If we were paying that amount of cash to someone, I would certainly know: Adani group CFO on US indictment
- Indian Railways’ first bullet train, with 250 kmph average speed & Kavach 5.0, is being made in India - check details
end of article
Trending Stories
- India Q2 GDP Growth 2024 Live Updates: Indian economy likely slowed down in July-September quarter
- PAN 2.0: Will You Get A New PAN Card & Will Your Existing PAN Become Invalid? What’s Special About PAN With Enhanced QR Code? Top 10 Points Taxpayers Should Know
- Bank Holidays December 2024: On what days will banks be closed in December? Check state-wise holiday list
- Special Vande Bharat trains for Kashmir! Indian Railways to introduce new Vande Bharat trains with ‘heating’ features - check details
- High-speed 280 kmph trains soon! Indian Railways to manufacture bullet trains - check top features
- IAF’s Sukhoi-30 MKI fighter jets: India, Russia exploring joint production of Sukhoi engine
- Stock market today: BSE Sensex surges over 700 points; Nifty50 above 24,100
Visual Stories
- NEET UG 2024 result awaited: Top 10 NIRF-ranked medical colleges of India
- 7 New Expected Bullet Train Routes in India
- 10 Upcoming High-Speed Expressways That Will Change Highway Travel In India
- 8 Transformational Indian Railways Projects You Shouldn’t Miss
- Why Sensex, Nifty50 Hit New Highs, M-Cap At $5 Trillion: Top Reasons
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment