Meta's $20 billion acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp back under fire as US government appeals loss

Meta's $20 billion acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp back under fire as US government appeals loss
The Federal Trade Commission is appealing a ruling that dismissed its monopoly case against Meta, aiming to force the tech giant to divest Instagram and WhatsApp. A judge previously found Meta did not hold an illegal monopoly, citing the rise of TikTok and YouTube.
The Federal Trade Commission is taking another swing at Meta, filing an appeal Tuesday to challenge a November ruling that cleared the tech giant of monopoly charges. The move keeps alive the government's years-long effort to potentially force Meta to divest Instagram and WhatsApp—acquisitions made over a decade ago for $1 billion and $19 billion respectively.US District Judge James Boasberg had sided with Meta last year, concluding the company doesn't hold an illegal monopoly in personal social networking. His reasoning? The explosive growth of TikTok and YouTube fundamentally reshaped the competitive landscape, undercutting the FTC's arguments about Meta's market dominance.

Trump-Era case continues despite Zuckerberg's courtship

The appeal adds an awkward political dimension for Mark Zuckerberg, who spent much of 2025 attempting to repair his relationship with Donald Trump. Meta donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration fund and paid $25 million to settle lawsuits over the president's suspended Facebook and Instagram accounts. Despite these overtures, the FTC—now operating under Trump's second term—remains committed to the case."Meta violated our antitrust laws when it acquired Instagram and WhatsApp," FTC spokesperson Joe Simonson said, emphasizing that "American consumers have suffered from Meta's monopoly."
The agency's Bureau of Competition Director Daniel Guarnera framed the appeal as protecting fair competition, arguing Meta maintained dominance "not through legitimate competition, but by buying its most significant competitive threats."

What's actually at stake for Meta

If the FTC succeeds on appeal, Meta could face forced restructuring or divestment of its prized acquisitions. The original 2020 lawsuit alleged Meta identified Instagram and WhatsApp as nascent threats and purchased them specifically to eliminate competition—a strategy the government claims allowed Meta to degrade service quality while loading up on ads without fear of users fleeing to alternatives.Meta's response has been measured. Spokesperson Andy Stone simply reiterated that the district court decision was "correct" and that Meta "will remain focused on innovating and investing in America"—echoing Trump-friendly talking points about domestic job creation even as the legal battle intensifies.

author
About the AuthorTOI Tech Desk

The TOI Tech Desk is a dedicated team of journalists committed to delivering the latest and most relevant news from the world of technology to readers of The Times of India. TOI Tech Desk’s news coverage spans a wide spectrum across gadget launches, gadget reviews, trends, in-depth analysis, exclusive reports and breaking stories that impact technology and the digital universe. Be it how-tos or the latest happenings in AI, cybersecurity, personal gadgets, platforms like WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook and more; TOI Tech Desk brings the news with accuracy and authenticity.

End of Article
Follow Us On Social Media