Candace Owens comes up with new theory on Charlie Kirk, says Tyler Robinson has been framed, everything is a lie

Candace Owens has come up with a new conspiracy theory claiming that she now has sources confirming that Tyler Robinson was framed and he was not the person who shot and killed conservative leader Charlie Kirk.

Candace said everything the Feds said about the case so far and about how Tyler Robinson was caught is a lie, including that Tyler Robinson is suicidal.

“I want to break this news immediately because it feels important and I think if I don’t break it immediately, something bad might happen," Candace said teasing a big reveal on Monday giving a weekend cliffhanger for her viewers.


“Tyler Robinson is not suicidal. The entire narrative that was placed in the media about him having been suicidal is completely fictional, as are many other aspects of what we have been told… His father having “turned him in after a confession” is also complete fiction. To the contrary, Tyler Robinson maintains his innocence and has never even been to the UVU campus,” she said.

“Which is why they have produced nothing other than a blurry image which Tyler’s family knows is not him,” she continued. “…The federal government is lying about absolutely everything except for the fact that it is her gun…”

Candace's earlier theory of Israel, Bill Ackman

Candace earlier claimed that Kirk was pressured to visit Israel by hedge fund manager Bill Ackman. Candace said Ackman threatened Kirk during a high-stakes "intervention" in the Hamptons, weeks before the murder.

Ackman called Candace out for defaming him. “For the record, at no time have I ever threatened Charlie Kirk, Turning Point or anyone associated with him,” Ackman said. “I have never blackmailed anyone, let alone Charlie Kirk. I have never offered Charlie or Turning Point any money in an attempt to influence Charlie's opinion on anything. In fact, my interactions with Charlie Kirk have been extremely cordial, albeit limited, regretfully so, as I was very impressed by him and his work and I will sadly never see him again.”