Responding to Trump’s claim that things were going “fine with China” and that tariffs on Chinese exports could be lowered from the current 145%, Chinese officials said no such discussions were taking place.
“For all I know, China and the US are not having any consultation or negotiation on tariffs, still less reaching a deal,” said Guo Jiakun, spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry.
Commerce Ministry spokesperson He Yadong added, “Any claims about the progress of China-US trade negotiations are as groundless as trying to catch the wind. There is no factual basis.” He reaffirmed China’s openness to dialogue, but only on the basis of mutual respect and equality.
President Trump, however, maintained that talks were ongoing. When asked about China’s denial, he responded vaguely: “They had a meeting this morning... it doesn’t matter who they is.”
Conflicting messages continued from the Trump administration throughout the day. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he had a “very successful” meeting with South Korea and hinted that a trade deal could be finalized as early as next week. Yet minutes later, Trump said it was “physically impossible” to negotiate with dozens of countries and proposed simply setting prices for trade deals. “Some will be tariffed,” he said. “Some treated us very unfairly. They’ll be tariffed higher than others.”
The Trump administration has imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese imports, with Beijing responding with 125% tariffs on US goods. While other countries received temporary tariff exemptions, China remained an exception—escalating its own tariffs, restricting rare earth exports, and launching WTO cases against the US.
China has made it clear that talks must include a rollback of all US-imposed tariffs.
“If the United States really wants to solve the problem, it should cancel all unilateral tariff measures against China and resolve differences through equal dialogue,” He said.
Despite tensions, Trump on Tuesday took a softer tone, saying he would be “very nice” to Chinese President Xi Jinping and that both countries could “live together very happily and ideally work together.”