HC bins plea seeking protection of shrines within KGMU premises
Lucknow: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking protection of land belonging to the shrines of Hazrat Makhdoom Shah Meena Sahib Dargah and Haji-ul-Harmain Shah Dargah, located within the premises of KGMU.
The petition had also sought removal of alleged encroachments and directions to prevent interference in religious activities.
A division bench comprising Justice Alok Mathur and Justice Amitabh Kumar Rai passed the order on a petition filed by Syed Babar Islam and another petitioner.
They contended that the properties attached to the two dargahs were not protected adequately. The petitioners alleged that portions of the land had been encroached upon and that activities undertaken by the KGMU administration were affecting the dargah land. They sought directions restraining interference with religious and cultural practices, removal of alleged encroachments, and protection of the properties.
During the hearing, the bench was informed that the dargah management committee had earlier approached the high court regarding the same dispute. In those proceedings, KGMU had stated that no damage was being caused to the dargah premises and that devotees faced no obstruction in visiting the shrines or offering prayers.
In its order, the court observed that the management committee is the legally authorised body to safeguard the dargah’s property and rights. It held that a person cannot seek relief concerning the overall protection and management of shrine property merely on the basis of being a devotee.
The bench further clarified that under Section 83(2) of the Waqf Act, 1995, not only a mutawalli but any aggrieved person may approach the waqf tribunal. As an effective statutory remedy is available under the Act, the petitioners were at liberty to pursue their grievances before the tribunal.
With these observations, the court dismissed the petition, holding it to be devoid of merit.
A division bench comprising Justice Alok Mathur and Justice Amitabh Kumar Rai passed the order on a petition filed by Syed Babar Islam and another petitioner.
They contended that the properties attached to the two dargahs were not protected adequately. The petitioners alleged that portions of the land had been encroached upon and that activities undertaken by the KGMU administration were affecting the dargah land. They sought directions restraining interference with religious and cultural practices, removal of alleged encroachments, and protection of the properties.
During the hearing, the bench was informed that the dargah management committee had earlier approached the high court regarding the same dispute. In those proceedings, KGMU had stated that no damage was being caused to the dargah premises and that devotees faced no obstruction in visiting the shrines or offering prayers.
In its order, the court observed that the management committee is the legally authorised body to safeguard the dargah’s property and rights. It held that a person cannot seek relief concerning the overall protection and management of shrine property merely on the basis of being a devotee.
The bench further clarified that under Section 83(2) of the Waqf Act, 1995, not only a mutawalli but any aggrieved person may approach the waqf tribunal. As an effective statutory remedy is available under the Act, the petitioners were at liberty to pursue their grievances before the tribunal.
Comments
Be the first to share a thought and become theFirst Voiceof this News Article
Popular from Business
- Fuel price cut call: Transporters body urge Centre to cut petrol, diesel prices as crude falls to $90 per barrel
- What ‘home’ means is changing in Pune: The story of Casagrand Caladium
- India’s bullet train project: Nine years later, is the dream finally nearing reality?
- No need to leave US for green card, DHS clarifies
- 70% drop in gold demand: Import duty hike from 6% to 15% rattles buyers
end of article
Trending Stories
- Why did stock market crash in the final hours of trade today? Sensex, Nifty50 plunge - check top reasons
- US-Iran conflict: India to shrug off adverse impact? RBI confident of domestic resilience - key takeaways
06:16 Setback for Indian mango exports! Why Japan has stopped imports of Kesar, Alphonso, Langra & other varieties from India- Shampoo, sacks and more: How is Middle East conflict making your groceries costlier?
- Bank holiday today: Are banks closed on May 28 for Bakri Eid? Check state-wise list
- Stock market holiday on Bakri Id: Are BSE, NSE closed for trading on May 28?
- 8th Pay Commission: Railway staff body seeks different fitment factors; here are their recommendations on salary hike
Photostories
- From Sarah Jessica Parker to Jon Bon Jovi, here are all of the celebrities who flaunt their gray hair like a crown
- Love quote of the day by Aristotle: "Love is composed of a single soul inhabiting two bodies"
- 'Spider-Noir' to 'Deli Boys': Latest Hollywood series and films to watch over the weekend
- Parkinson's before 50? Doctor explains the early warning signs most people ignore
- Don’t throw away your potato peels: 5 smart ways to repurpose them
- You’re walking, not running, so why are you breathless? Doctor explains what your body may be trying to tell you
- 5 lessons of perfect marriage we all need to learn from Preity Zinta and Gene Goodenough
- One workout a week can help you lose weight, new study finds
- Asthma is no longer just about dust and pollution: Doctor warns stress, poor sleep and modern lifestyles are triggering more attacks
- Why thousands of Indian children with Autism are diagnosed late: Doctors explain what early intervention can change
Up Next
Follow Us On Social Media