Battle of the Sexes: Social media explodes after Kyrgios beats Sabalenka in Dubai exhibition

The 2025 “Battle of the Sexes” tennis exhibition in Dubai triggered an intense backlash on social media after Nick Kyrgios defeated women’s world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka 6–3, 6–3. While organisers framed the match as entertainment, reaction on X focused overwhelmingly on criticism, with fans, commentators and former players calling the event embarrassing, regressive and damaging to women’s tennis.

A central point of anger was the rule set used for the exhibition. Sabalenka played on a court reduced by roughly nine per cent, and both players were limited to one serve per point. Rather than being welcomed as balancing mechanisms, many users on X described the rules as insulting and artificial. Tennis journalist Ben Rothenberg called the match “an absolute farce,” while others said the format mocked the concept of equality by highlighting physical differences under contrived conditions.



Several posts explicitly referenced Billie Jean King’s landmark 1973 victory over Bobby Riggs, arguing that the Dubai exhibition cheapened that legacy. Critics said the original match carried cultural and political weight, whereas this version amounted to a publicity stunt with no meaningful stakes.

The strongest reactions centred on the impact on women’s tennis. Many users argued that putting Sabalenka, a four-time Grand Slam champion, into a modified exhibition against a male player was inherently damaging. Some described her participation as embarrassing, while others accused organisers of using her status to generate clicks at the expense of the women’s game.




Posts with high engagement framed the result as proof that such matches reinforce, rather than challenge, arguments for separating men’s and women’s sport. Others labelled the event a “money grab” that did nothing to advance respect or visibility for women’s tennis.

Kyrgios also came under criticism, despite winning comfortably. Some viewers accused him of putting in minimal effort, arguing that even an unfit or injury-affected Kyrgios winning easily under modified rules made the spectacle worse, not better. The criticism extended to the broadcast itself, with complaints about technical problems and on-air apologies during coverage adding to the perception of a poorly executed event.




Both players defended the exhibition afterward. Sabalenka said she did not understand the negativity and argued that the match brought attention to tennis. Kyrgios praised her competitiveness and framed the contest as entertainment. Those comments, however, did little to shift the dominant tone online, where criticism continued to outweigh defence.

While the match drew a sold-out crowd and massive online engagement, the reaction on X remained sharply polarised and often hostile. For many critics, the exhibition reinforced why men’s and women’s tennis exist as separate competitions. Others argued that reviving the “Battle of the Sexes” branding without a clear purpose or equal footing was bound to provoke backlash.

Instead of being remembered as a novelty, the Kyrgios–Sabalenka match has become a flashpoint in ongoing debates about gender, sport and how far exhibitions should go in chasing attention.