indian judiciary

The Supreme Court has assured three academics that harsh remarks against them in a previous order will be deleted. These remarks stemmed from a Class 8 NCERT chapter on judicial corruption. The court clarified its concern was the chapter's content, not the individuals, emphasizing the need for balanced academic discussions on the judiciary while respecting constitutional frameworks.

The Supreme Court has agreed to remove harsh remarks made against three academicians linked to the controversial NCERT Class 8 chapter on corruption in the judiciary. The Court clarified that its criticism was aimed at the textbook content, not the individuals. It also stressed the need for balanced and responsible academic material on constitutional institutions.

'Govt change sans violence best proof'

The evolution of legal perception in India now includes the recognition of live-in relationships, offering vital protections primarily for women and their children. While these arrangements differ from traditional marriages, they present avenues for victims of domestic violence to seek help, ensure maintenance support, and affirm the legitimacy of their children.

Can a former chief minister simply wear an advocate’s gown? The answer matters, otherwise, tomorrow, retired actors may claim surgical privileges because they played doctors

Senior advocate Tushar Mehta's upcoming book criticizes some judges for exhibiting 'judicial bullying' due to excessive courtroom reverence. He argues that while judges face immense pressure, this cannot justify incivility, as the public expects high standards from an institution they cannot easily remove. Mehta highlights the power imbalance lawyers face when confronting arrogant judges.

A pregnant 15-yr-old’s ordeal again underscored the conceptual flaw in our abortion law. MTP law, despite amendments, makes terminating pregnancy an arbitrary process. Everyone has a say, except the woman

India's maternity law has been significantly reformed by the Supreme Court, striking down a discriminatory three-month age limit for adoptive mothers' leave. This landmark ruling recognizes that the crucial bonding period for adopted children isn't bound by a strict timeline, ensuring substantive justice and dignity for all mothers. The judgment champions a broader understanding of parenthood and caregiving.

The 2026 Indian Assembly Elections showcased a nation in transition, marked by regional pride, welfare economics, and celebrity influence. Tragedies, controversial rhetoric, and mass voter roll deletions defined campaigns across states, leading to high voter turnout and intense political theatre.

Kasturi Shankar, a Tamil actor and activist has quickly gained wide traction online due to her claim that India is 'terrible' and does not welcome self-built entrepreneurs in its system, filled with bias and corruption. Shankar was replying to Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu's post on X (formerly Twitter) titled 'Open letter to Indians in America' where he invited the Indian-origin people to return to their motherland to help build the country's technological future.

Dr Bomsi Wadia, a globally recognised gynaecologist, has moved the Bombay HC to adopt his longtime caregiver, Rajeev Jha — raising questions of rights, legacy, and what defines family in modern India

No torn blouses, leering villains and revenge sagas. Some filmmakers are moving beyond tropes to confront the ordinariness of sexual offenders and systems that enable everyday harm

Former Army Chief General M.M. Naravane emphasized keeping armed forces away from political narratives, while acknowledging individual democratic rights. His remarks followed a controversy where excerpts from his unpublished memoir were cited in Parliament, sparking debates on national security and civil-military relations.

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra criticized the government's women's reservation and delimitation bills in Lok Sabha, calling them an "open attack" on democracy. She questioned the delay in implementation and alleged the government is diverting from the core issue of women's reservation, while reaffirming Congress's support.

A proposed three-year practice rule for India's judicial services sparks debate. While proponents cite enhanced competence through courtroom experience, critics highlight potential barriers to access. This reform could disproportionately affect women and first-generation lawyers. Past evaluations suggest such rigid requirements may limit diversity. Alternative structured training could balance experience with inclusivity for a stronger judiciary.

A fire at Justice Yashwant Varma's Delhi residence revealed partially burnt high-denomination currency notes, sparking a high-level judicial and governmental probe. A fireman's remark about Gandhi on the notes, captured on video, highlighted the incident's gravity. The discovery led to swift action, with the Delhi Police Commissioner briefing the Chief Justice and a report sent to the Union Home Ministry.

The Allahabad High Court has acquitted Rayyan, the final convict in the 2016 murder of NIA officer Tanzeel Ahmed and his wife Farzana. A local court had previously sentenced Rayyan and Munir to death. Munir died in custody. The family of the slain officer plans to appeal the High Court's decision in the Supreme Court. The attack occurred in 2016.

On the recent controversy involving UGC regulations aimed at maintaining standards, quality and equity in Indian higher education, Pradhan refrained from detailed comment, noting the matter is sub judice. “The govt’s responsibility is to ensure that no one faces injustice or discrimination. We will abide by whatever directions court issues,” he said. Outlining the ministry’s broader priorities, Pradhan said the education system currently serves around 30 crore students, placing significant responsibility on policymakers.

In his address at NUSRL, Supreme Court Justice B.V. Nagarathna proclaimed that environmental justice is not simply a policy preference but a constitutional obligation. She implored the judiciary to take an active role in tackling ecological issues, underscoring the importance of sustainable practices and the principle that the polluters should bear the cost of damage.